Ew
I too read Entertainment Weekly, but have not yet gotten this issue; I am now pre-emptively annoyed. (Most weeks I am just pre-emptively annoyed with the Ghost of Jim Mullen, who now lingers over the Hot List, or whatever it's called, like a cantankerous ghostly presence of unfunniness.) Sarah Lindner over at the Austin American-Statesman preaches it:
"[D]id the magazine have to emphasize plus-size chick-lit author Jennifer Weiner's weight above all else? As we all know, if you're overweight, that negates every other quality you possess. It is possible that you do not even have a soul. I'm not saying don't mention it -- Weiner's heroines are overweight -- but the whole article doesn't have to read like 'LOOK! She's fat!'"
"[D]id the magazine have to emphasize plus-size chick-lit author Jennifer Weiner's weight above all else? As we all know, if you're overweight, that negates every other quality you possess. It is possible that you do not even have a soul. I'm not saying don't mention it -- Weiner's heroines are overweight -- but the whole article doesn't have to read like 'LOOK! She's fat!'"
2 Comments:
I saw that article, and it didn't bother me at all. After reading this post here- I went to her website and found...
Friday, September 10, 2004
posted by Jen at 9/10/2004 02:46:50 PM
Whoo-hoo!
There's a really, really great article about me in Entertainment Weekly today.
Also, a picture of me in a slip, with an expression that can be described alternately as "pensive" or "bad oysters...
She didn't seem to mind at all.
Yeah, Anon, I meant to post that exact same quote! If Jen Weiner herself didn't have a problem with it, maybe the article isn't so skewed. Like I said, I haven't read it yet.
Post a Comment
<< Home